Ivermectin Use Successful in 63 Studies

63 studies of ivermectin use

Iivermectin usen a meta-analysis of 63 studies of ivermectin use for covid, 100% showed positive results. These studies were from all continents except Antarctica.

In these 63 studies, there was a 69% improvement in early treatment & for prophylactic use there was an 86% improvement. Mortality improved 84% when ivermectin was used in early treatment of covid.

The first clinical trial of ivermectin vs. covid was in four Florida hospitals in 2020. While 38.8% of the people in the treatment died, they faired much better than the control group. There the mortality was over twice as high — 80.7% of them died.

Summary

The 2 minute video below summarizes what’s on this web page. It will also help you to remember what you read here.

Ivermectin in Africa

ivermectin useIn an African  study there were millions of people available in both the experimental group and the control group.

In 31 African countries,  onchocerciasis is a common disease. Ivermectin is readily available in these countries and is commonly used to prevent that disease. The covid death rate was 88.2% lower than in 22 countries in which ivermectin is not in widespread use. Morbidity was found to be 85.7% lower in the 31 countries where the population uses ivermectin regularly.

Note the countries in blue in the map of Africa below. In the blue countries Ivermectin is taken almost daily (because of the small worms in the drinking water). At the bottom is the COVID mortality curve of those countries (blue) compared to the 22 African  countries (tan) that don’t take Ivermectin.

Read the scientific study behind this map.

If you read the scientific study behind this map, you will note that both the morbidity and the mortality were statistically significantly less in the 31 blue countries.

The American FDA and ivermectin

The FDA has stated, “Any use of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 should be avoided as its benefits and safety for these purposes have not been established.” The FDA offered no supporting evidence for their claim.

The World Health Organization (WHO) also recommends against using ivermectin to treat Covid as do other 3-letter agencies.

However, the evidence was shown above. The general population can only conclude that these agencies are somehow protecting the financial health of Big Pharma. This is at the expense of the physical health of much of the world’s population.

Psychological evaluation ordered

A 25-year Maine doctor has had her license temporarily suspended and been ordered to submit to a psychological evaluation for the alleged offenses of treating her patients with Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. The governing body responsible for her punishment says her action gave “an immediate jeopardy to the health and physical safety of the public.”

The government solution to covid is the vaccine. Now consider how dangerous the vaccines are. Look at the beginning of this article and consider how safe ivermectin is.

Will we ever trust our governments again?

‘Millions of Lives Lost’ in Pandemic Mainly From Pharma-Government Nexus, Says Critical Care Expert

Dr. Pierre Kory, a pulmonary and critical care medicine specialist, is blaming the nexus between the pharma industry and the government along with corrupt medical journals for deceiving the public about COVID-19 and vaccines, which resulted in “millions of lives lost.”

“The high-impact medical journals played a massive role in the human toll of COVID by censoring positive studies of repurposed drugs like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin,” he noted.

“They published clearly fraudulent trials that were designed to fail; to show that ivermectin didn’t work, and to show that hydroxychloroquine didn’t work.

“I always knew pharma was bad. I didn’t understand that they are literally a criminal syndicate, who have been committing crimes for decades. They pay fines, then move on and continue their standard operating business,” Kory said.

“Ultimately, it was a war of information. All of the destruction was about information and how it was controlled. I was already transformed before the Twitter Files. The Twitter Files are just absolutely astonishing. Government intelligence agencies and health agencies were literally controlling Twitter, and what was showing up on Twitter,” he said.

In a March 17 exposé, investigative journalist Matt Taibbi revealed the alleged collusion between Stanford University’s Virality Project (VP) and Twitter to censor what they deemed to be misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines.

According to Kory, corporations are funding media agencies to promote vaccine campaigns and censor any information that would raise the levels of vaccine hesitancy among people.

“It was a war where the voices of truth and sanity were getting drowned out by lies that were told for different objectives. The CEO of Moderna has $4 billion [in] wealth. The pharmaceutical companies made tens to hundreds of billions with this massive transfer of wealth.

The above quotations were from an Epoch Times article. Read it here.

Glossary

Merriam-Webster’s definition of mortality — the death of large numbers (as of people or animals).

According to Healthlinemorbidity is the state of having a specific illness or condition. On this page, morbidity would refer to the state of having Covid-19.

Popular Paper on Ivermectin and COVID-19 Contains False Information

April 2024

In 2021 a journal, Clinical Infectious Diseases, explored how groups in randomized, controlled trials fared after receiving ivermectin compared to control groups. Among five trials included for the portion on all-cause mortality, none showed an effect for ivermectin, the authors claimed.

But the claim is wrong. One of the five trials was described as finding ivermectin recipients were more likely to die, but actually found that ivermectin recipients were less likely to die. “The risk base estimation … confirmed that the average mortality obtained in all of ivermectin treated arms was 3.3%, while it was about 18.3% in standard care and placebo arms,” the authors of that paper said.

The above data comes from The Epoch Times. Read the rest of the story here.

FDA Forced to Remove False Claims about Ivermectin from Social Media: ‘Blood on Its Hands’

March, 2024

Democrat President Joe Biden’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been forced to remove social media posts that contain false anti-ivermectin claims. After losing its legal battle against ivermectin, the FDA has agreed to remove webpages and its social media posts urging people to avoid the usage of the drug for Covid treatment.

The FDA has already taken down a page that stated: “Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? No.” It will also delete posts, including one that reads: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”

According to a settlement agreement filed with the federal court in Southern Texas, the FDA will also remove another page titled: “Why you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19. The page must be removed within 21 days.”

Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr in a tweet said, “The FDA is biased against many low-cost, generic, and/or natural therapies with low-profit potential. Could it be because half its funding comes from Big Pharma?”

The above data comes from Slay News. Read the rest of the story here.

Doctors Can Prescribe Ivermectin for COVID-19: FDA Lawyer

Doctors are free to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID-19, a lawyer representing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said this week.

“FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID,” Ashley Cheung Honold, a Department of Justice lawyer representing the FDA, said during oral arguments on Aug. 8 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.

Judges indicated they agree that the FDA lacks the power to give medical advice; Judge Clement said, “You’re not authorized to give medical advice.”

The quotes above are from The Epoch Times. To read the entire new story, click here.